As part of an investigation into the governance and financial management of Magdalen College School, I read online profiles of the Master, Helen Pike.
Why are all the articles about her so gushing? She’s a public figure making political decisions about the future of one of England’s most prestigious educational institutions.
They just publish advertorial for MCS. You’d think journalists would exercise some critical faculties.
They could at least make teasing comments about her Miranda Priestley sense of fashion, or tame jokes about her resemblance to Miss Honey in Roald Dahl’s Matilda or recherché references to the ‘Queen Semiramis’ of Cowley Place.
Anything!
In my article I had the temerity to suggest that far from building the school upon the rock, she had expanded it onto the sand. And now the rains are tumbling down.
I urged everyone associated with the school to reject Pike’s plan, which I argued, was to turn MCS into a secular, coeducational global franchise.
My alternative vision? I want the school to go back to educating the sons of Oxford’s professional classes as cheaply as possible, as it did in the C20th.
That’s a legitimate political intervention, isn’t it?
Why does nobody else want to stand up to her?